Free Newsletter
FILE PHOTO: Alex Richard Murdaugh is seen in this police mugshot photo in Orlando, Florida, U.S., October 14, 2021. Picture taken October 14, 2021. ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT./File Photo
South Carolina lawyer Murdaugh’s murder conviction overturned
Reuters//May 14, 2026//
Summary:
- South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously overturns conviction
- County clerk Becky Hill improperly influenced jury
- Attorney General Alan Wilson plans immediate retrial
South Carolina’s highest court on May 13 overturned the murder conviction of former lawyer Richard “Alex” Murdaugh, who was serving two consecutive life sentences for allegedly shooting his wife and 22-year-old son dead in June 2021.
Murdaugh, 57, will remain in state prison where he is serving a 27-year sentence for financial crimes.
The state’s supreme court ruled his 2023 murder trial was marred by the “improper” influence of county clerk Becky Hill, who oversaw the jury in the case. The decision followed a February request by Murdaugh’s attorney for a new trial.
South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said his office would retry Murdaugh as soon as possible.
“No one is above the law,” Wilson said in a statement.
In court filings, Murdaugh’s lawyers argued he deserved a new trial based on alleged jury tampering and prosecutorial errors during the investigation and trial.
Murdaugh is from an influential legal family in an area west of Charleston. His case drew nationwide interest given his political power and the nature of the violent crime involving his family members.
In their unanimous ruling, the supreme court judges said Hill told some jurors to watch Murdaugh’s body language and not be “fooled or convinced” by what he said when he testified in his own defense.
“Hill essentially implored the jurors to find him guilty,” the judges wrote. By doing so, they said she “placed her fingers on the scales of justice, thereby denying Murdaugh his right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.”
Justin Bamberg, an attorney representing Hill, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
(Reporting by Andrew Hay in New Mexico, Editing by Rod Nickel and Bill Berkrot)
Related Articles
Related Content
Top Legal News
- US appeals court questions Trump’s push to punish major law firms
- South Carolina lawyer Murdaugh’s murder conviction overturned
- Wage claims survive dismissal in employment dispute
- SC GOP announces plans to file a federal lawsuit to close primaries
- Evidence of undue influence required jury review in will dispute
- Asheville faces lawsuit after fatal sanitation truck accident
- Surgical misidentification leaves 2-year-old injured
- Lawsuit seeks to halt Trump’s makeover of Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool
- ‘Reckless’ response: Officer’s run to routine shoplifting call leaves man paralyzed
- Political commentary not directed at candidate cannot support no-contact order
- NC DOT liable after pedestrian struck in Chapel Hill crosswalk
Commentary
- When not to believe (your lyin’ eyes)
- Conduct a technology audit to improve law firm efficiency
- When the client brings ChatGPT to the consultation
- Content Marketing: Where law firms lose referrals and how to prevent it
- Your best people are not leaving for more money — they are leaving because you stopped paying attention
- Best at Work Insights: The choice we’re making about AI
- New life for the noncompete
- 2026: The year of tech, both heroes and villains
- Beyond burnout: The case for workplaces where people thrive
- The December question every leader should anticipate
- How do parent corporations deal with Workers’ Compensation?
- Best at Work Insights: Don’t Import 996: Why America Should Reject Overwork Culture
